A Quarter Review
SMID-cap equities advanced to new all-time highs during the second quarter, delivering their strongest quarterly return since 2020. Earnings trends remained constructive, with a broad majority of companies reporting first-quarter results above expectations, supporting continued upward revisions to future earnings estimates. Consensus forecasts now call for approximately 36% earnings growth in 2026.
Performance leadership was highly concentrated. The Technology sector advanced 66% during the quarter, making it the only sector to outperform the broader SMID-cap market. Semiconductor companies drove much of the gain as investor enthusiasm surrounding AI-related infrastructure spending and data center investment continued to accelerate. In contrast, Energy was the weakest-performing sector, declining 10%. Oil prices quickly retraced gains following a ceasefire in the Middle East and the resumption of tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, easing supply concerns.
Performance Summary
The SMID Cap Core Strategy returned +10.97% net of fees during the quarter, compared with +20.26% for the Russell 2500 Index. The Strategy's emphasis on high-quality businesses has historically resulted in a lower-beta, lower-volatility profile, which can create relative headwinds during periods when risk-taking is strongly rewarded.
Small-cap equities were a notable beneficiary of the market’s risk appetite. The Russell 2000 gained 21.5%, outperforming the Russell Midcap Index’s 13.8% return. The Strategy’s structural overweight to mid-cap companies relative to the Russell 2500 detracted from performance during the quarter and over the trailing twelve months.
The market’s preference for lower-quality and more cyclical companies also weighed on results. Since the market rebound that began in April 2025, lower-quality stocks have significantly outperformed businesses characterized by strong profitability, resilient balance sheets, and consistent earnings growth—attributes that remain central to our investment philosophy.
Market narrowness presented additional challenges. The portfolio’s underexposure to the Technology sector, particularly semiconductors, resulted in negative sector attribution. Security selection also detracted, reflecting an underweight position in semiconductor companies and an overweight allocation to software and services. The absence of Sandisk Corp., the benchmark’s top-performing stock during the quarter, accounted for approximately 270 basis points of relative underperformance. Industrials and Health Care also detracted as the portfolio held a higher-quality mix of stocks than the benchmark.
1) Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there is a risk of loss of all or part of your investment. The above does not represent all holdings in the Strategy. Holdings listed might not have been held for the full period. To obtain a copy of Johnson Asset Management’s calculation methodology and a list of all holdings with contribution analysis, please contact your service team. The data provided is supplemental. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
2) Holdings are subject to change. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there is risk of loss of all or part of your investment. The data provided is supplemental. Please see disclosures at the end of this document.
Market Outlook and Portfolio Positioning
During the quarter, portfolio activity was higher than normal. The strong market move changed valuation upside in many holdings and pushed some stocks outside of our targeted market cap range. New purchases in the quarter included a profitable biotechnology company and a few companies with exposure to the datacenter capital spending boom that is driving marginal earnings growth.
The recent market environment has been challenging for quality-oriented SMID cap strategies. However, these challenges have created a compelling opportunity. Research shows that the quality factor has historically delivered excess returns across full market cycles. Timing factor rotation is difficult to do consistently, but recent underperformance suggests a buying opportunity for quality investors. The degree of underperformance for the quality factor is similar to the late 1990’s Dot-Com bubble and the post-COVID recovery of 2020. Both of those periods were followed by markets that broadened in participation, and quality recaptured the performance gap.
For investors considering a single allocation across small- and mid-cap equities, the Strategy offers exposure to a disciplined quality process at a point when history suggests the opportunity set may be particularly attractive.
The Johnson SMID Cap Core Equity Strategy seeks to consistently outperform the Russell 2500 Index over a full market cycle with less volatility. The Strategy seeks to identify stocks that are making smart allocation decisions, with a favorable combination of quality, valuation, and momentum characteristics. For more information on our products and services, please contact a member of our Sales & Client Service Team at 513.389.2770 or info@johnsonasset.com.
Published 07/27/2026
Johnson Asset Management (JAM) is a division of Johnson Investment Counsel, Inc. (“JIC”), an independent and privately owned Midwestern based investment advisory ?rm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Johnson Asset Management manages institutional separate account portfolios for a wide variety of for-pro?t and nonpro?t organizations, public agencies, public and private retirement plans, and personal trusts of all sizes. It may also serve as sub-adviser for mutual funds. JIC’s fees are available upon request and may be found in our Form ADV Part 2A. Performance data quoted herein represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. All data is current as of June 30, 2026 unless otherwise noted. Returns and net asset value will ?uctuate. To determine if this strategy is appropriate for you, carefully consider the investment objectives, risk factors, and expenses before investing. Individual account management and construction will vary depending on each client's investment needs and objectives. Investments employing JIC’s strategies are NOT insured by the FDIC or by any other Federal Government Agency, are NOT Bank deposits, are NOT guaranteed by any Bank or any Bank af?liate, and MAY lose value, including possible loss of principal. Johnson Asset Management claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS). GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein. A complete list of ?rm composites and performance results and the policies for valuing portfolios, calculating performance, and preparing GIPS compliant presentations are available upon request by calling 513-389-2770. Composite: The Johnson SMID Cap Core Equity Composite was created on January 1, 2013, and includes all of JIC’s fee paying, fully discretionary institutional equity portfolios with a minimum of $1,000,000 and an investment objective of small and mid-cap equities. The benchmark for this composite is the Russell 2500, a broadly diversi?ed mid and small cap equity universe of U.S. companies. Eligible new portfolios are included in the composite the ?rst full month after being deemed fully invested. The returns from terminated portfolios are included prior to the date of termination. Effective January 2010, a portfolio will be temporarily removed from this composite if it experiences a net in?ow or out?ow of cash of 30% or more during a one-month period. Other than the futures contracts that are utilized to replicate the S&P 500, no leverage is used in the Composite portfolios. Portfolios in this composite include cash, cash equivalents, investment securities, interest and dividends. The U.S. dollar is the base currency. All returns re?ect the reinvestment of investment income (dividends and/or interest) and capital gains. Valuations and returns are stated in U.S. dollars. Trade date accounting is used. Portfolio returns are calculated using time weighed return methodology on a monthly basis. Net returns shown re?ect gross performance less the highest fee schedule for this strategy. The highest investment management fee schedule for this strategy is 1.00%. Actual client returns could also be reduced by brokerage commissions, custodial fees, and other client paid expenses detailed in JIC’s Form ADV Part 2A.